Frontier to PiT

Output Explorer

Every prompt in the paper, and what each model wrote back.

Answer a question about a scanned page from its OCR text. Scored by exact match and ANLS against the accepted answers.

13 of 5,330 prompts

How many points are there in the index?→ 7 What is the word common in all the 7 points?→ water / Water Where is the 'drinking water' from?→ Deep well / Drinking water from deep well What is the first item in the index?→ Water from government drain ditch / 1. Water from government drain ditch Who is presenting this?→ Nancy Beck, PhD, DABT Which organization is Nancy associated with?→ American Chemistry Council / ACC What is the 4th concern?→ quantification of the suggestive cancer endpoint / Quantification of suggestive cancer endpoint Which council’s agenda is given?→ governor's pesticide council Which date's agenda is this?→ november 24, 1969 What does the heading of the document say?→ pharmhouse / PhaRmhouse / every thing you need for health and home ...... for less!What is the name of the Brand?→ winston / Winston Are there any CONSUMER OFFERS?→ none / NONE / no Who is on the CC list?→ ANGELA HOLNESS

Nearby prompts. All 5,330 DocVQA prompts

PromptDocVQA · pagethcn0226_3.png

What is the 4th concern?

OCR text of the page · 285 characters; the scanned image itself is not published

. . . ......
...........
Cross-cutting concerns
1) Use of outdated and problematic Preamble
2) Criteria for evaluating study quality
3) Benchmark dose modeling transparency
4) Quantification of the Suggestive cancer endpoint
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/thcn0226

System prompt · identical for every setup

Answer the question using only the OCR text from a single document page. Return only the answer, with no explanation. Preserve the answer wording from the OCR text when possible.

Expected answer

quantification of the suggestive cancer endpointQuantification of suggestive cancer endpoint

Ours

Exact match

Quantification of the Suggestive cancer endpoint

Aux 2015

Wrong

4th concern

PiT-FT 2015

Wrong

Empty response.

ChronoGPT 2015

Wrong

Use of outdated and problematic Preamble
Criteria for evaluating study quality
Benchmark dose modeling transparency