Output Explorer

Every prompt in the paper, and what each model wrote back.

Answer a question about a scanned page from its OCR text. Scored by exact match and ANLS against the accepted answers.

13 of 5,330 prompts

Nearby prompts. All 5,330 DocVQA prompts

PromptDocVQA · pagemnfl0228_2.png

Who conducted study for Department of Energy in March 1998?

OCR text of the page · 2,068 characters; the scanned image itself is not published
Global Climate Coalition -- Global Climate Economic Impact Studies
http:/www.globalclimate.org/studies.htm
Study: Energy Information Administration
Global
For: Department of Energy
Climate
Coalition
Date: March 1998
1275 K St, NW
The EIA concluded the Kyoto Treaty would only slow modestly the growth of
Washington,
GHG emissions. CO2 emissions would grow 32% above 1990 levels by
DC 20005
2010 - slightly less than the 44% growth that would occur without the treaty -
202-682-9161
because of growth of emissions in developing countries like China, Mexico
and India. By 2020, emissions would grow by nearly 60% even if the U.S.,
Media
Europe, Japan and other industrialized nations comply with the Kyoto
Contact:
requirements.
Frank
Maisano
Contact: Jay Hakes or Mary Hutzler at (202) 586-2222
202-628-3622
Study: Argonne National Laboratory
For: Department of Energy
Date: February 1997
The Argonne Study concluded that policy restrictions on six energy intensive
industries in developed countries, but not their less developed trading
partners, would result in significant adverse impact. Furthermore, the study
finds emissions would not be reduced significantly. The main effect of the
policy would be to redistribute output, employment and emissions from
developed countries to developing countries who are not required to
participate.
Contact: Harvey Drucker at (630) 252-3804 or Bill Wicker at (202)
586-5806
Study: WEFA, Inc.
For: Industry Groups
Date: April 1998
WEFA estimates that a carbon fee of $265 per metric ton would be required
by late next decade to reduce emissions to the Kyoto Protocol's levels,
resulting in (1) Total output reduction of 3.2% or $300 billion (in 1992$) or
$2700 per family; (2) Loss of more than 2.4 million jobs; (3) a competitive
advantage for advanced developing countries that are not required to
participate; and (4) Sharply higher gasoline (65 cents per gallon) and gas and
electricity prices (double).
Contact: Mary Novak at (781) 221-0340
2 of 4
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mnfl0228
7/6/99 4:50 PM
System prompt · identical for every setup
Answer the question using only the OCR text from a single document page. Return only the answer, with no explanation. Preserve the answer wording from the OCR text when possible.
Expected answer
Energy Information Administration
Models
4 of 4 columns · click a model to add or remove it

Ours

Exact match

Energy Information Administration

33 characters4 tokens

Aux 2015

Wrong

The study was conducted by the Argonne National Laboratory in February 1997, and the results were published in the WEFA, Inc. report in April 1998.

147 characters40 tokens

PiT-FT 2015

Wrong

<|<assistant|> <|<assistant|> <|<assistant|> <|<assistant|> <|<assistant|> <|<assistant|> <|<assistant|> <|<assistant|>

120 characters64 tokens

ChronoGPT 2015

Wrong

The EIA concluded the Kyoto Treaty would only slow modestly the growth of Washington, GHG emissions. CO2 emissions would grow 32% above 1990 levels by DC 20005 2010 - slightly less than the 44% growth that would occur without the treaty - 202-682-9161 because

259 characters64 tokens