Output Explorer

Every prompt in the paper, and what each model wrote back.

Answer a question about a scanned page from its OCR text. Scored by exact match and ANLS against the accepted answers.

13 of 5,330 prompts

Nearby prompts. All 5,330 DocVQA prompts

PromptDocVQA · pagemfpj0226_1.png

What is the P.O.Box no ?

OCR text of the page · 2,242 characters; the scanned image itself is not published
Science, Regulatory & Enviromental Management
Coca Cola
NORTH AMERICA
P.O. Box 1734
Atlanta, GA 30301
May 19, 2004
404.676.212
Mr. Stephen Schmidt, Editor
Nutrition Action Healthletter
Center for Science in the Public Interest
1875 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 300
Washington, DC 20009
Dear Mr. Schmidt:
The review of artificial sweeteners in "Sweet Nothings," Nutrition Action Healthletter, May
2004, provides some helpful information for readers but causes two areas of concern.
First, the article pictures a glass of Coca-cola in the section on saccharin, mistakenly indicating
that the beverage contains this sweetener. However, Coca-cola does not contain saccharin, and
readers should be informed of this error.
Second, discussions of the safety of saccharin and acesulfame potassium present a selective and
biased review of the data raising unsubstantiated fears among consumers. According to the
National Cancer Institute, "There is no evidence that the regulated artificial sweeteners on the
market in the United States are related to cancer risk in humans." The U.S. National Toxicology
Program has removed saccharin from the list of established human carcinogens. And the World
Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer confirmed that the evidence
is inadequate to link saccharin with human cancer. More than 90 countries approve the use of
saccharin.
Regarding acesulfame potassium, about 90 scientific studies, versus three mentioned in the story,
have thoroughly established the safety of acesulfame potassium. These studies are the basis for a
number of government authorities, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the
Commission of the European Communities, to conclude that acesulfame potassium is safe. The
American Dietetic Association has also affirmed the safety of acesulfame potassium, even during
pregnancy.
Many individuals count on CSPI for nutrition and health advice. But when the scientific data
and consensus of experts overwhelmingly differ from that reported in the Healthletter, readers
are misinformed.
Sincerely,
Barlaw Beck
Barbara L. Beck, M.S., R.D.
Principal Manager, Scientific and Regulatory Affairs
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mfpj0226
System prompt · identical for every setup
Answer the question using only the OCR text from a single document page. Return only the answer, with no explanation. Preserve the answer wording from the OCR text when possible.
Expected answer
1734
Models
4 of 4 columns · click a model to add or remove it

Ours

Exact match

1734

4 characters5 tokens

Aux 2015

Wrong

The P.O. Box no is:
P.O. Box 1734, Atlanta, GA 30301

No other information is provided in the OCR text.

107 characters40 tokens

PiT-FT 2015

Wrong

Empty response.

0 characters

ChronoGPT 2015

Wrong

Coca Cola Nutrition Action Healthletter 1875 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 300 Washington, DC 20009 May 19, 2004 404.676.212 Mr. Stephen Schmidt, Editor Nutrition Action Healthletter 1875 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 300

225 characters64 tokens