Frontier to PiT

Output Explorer

Every prompt in the paper, and what each model wrote back.

Given a pre-pandemic MD&A excerpt, predict the next year’s risks. Scored on pandemic, outbreak and supply-chain mentions.

13 of 200 prompts

National Fuel Gas Co · FY20192019-11-15Synopsys Inc · FY20192019-12-20Simpson Manufacturing Inc · FY20192019-02-27Argan Inc · FY20192019-04-10Masco Corp · FY20192019-02-07H&E Equipment Services Inc · FY20192019-02-21Morningstar Inc · FY20192019-03-01Raytheon Co · FY20192019-02-13Netflix Inc · FY20192019-01-29Ciena Corp · FY20192019-12-20Abiomed Inc · FY20192019-05-23Craft Brew Alliance Inc · FY20192019-03-06Tiffany & Co · FY20192019-03-22

Nearby prompts. All 200 10-K risk outlook prompts

PromptMorningstar Inc· filed2019-03-01· asked about2020

• an outage of our database, technology-based products and services, or network facilities or the movement of parts of The call took place on March 1, 2019. Predict the potential risks for this company in 2020

MD&A excerpt from the filing · 1,865 characters
The following is a section of an MD&A for Morningstar Inc:
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The discussion included in this section, as well as other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, contains forward-looking statements as that term is used in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on our current expectations about future events or future financial performance. Forward-looking statements by their nature address matters that are, to different degrees, uncertain, and often contain words such as “may,” “could,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” or “continue.” These statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause the events we discuss not to occur or to differ significantly from what we expect. For us, these risks and uncertainties

include, among others:

		
            •	liability for any losses that result from an actual or claimed breach of our fiduciary duties;	

		
            •	failing to maintain and protect our brand, independence, and reputation; 	

		
            •	failing to differentiate our products and continuously create innovative, proprietary research tools; 	

		
            •	liability related to the storage of personal information related to individuals as well as portfolio and account-level information; 	

		
            •	inadequacy of our business continuity program in the event of a material emergency or adverse political or regulatory developments;	

		
            •	failing to respond to technological change, keep pace with new technology developments, or adopt a successful technology strategy; 	

		
            •	trends in the asset management industry, including the decreasing popularity of actively managed investment vehicles and increased industry consolidation;
System prompt · given to Ours, Ours · thinking, Qwen 3.5 27B, Qwen 3.5 27B · thinking, Qwen 3.5 2B, Qwen 3.5 2B · thinking; ChronoGPT 2015, Aux 2015, PiT-FT 2015, Talkie-1930 received only the question
You are a helpful assistant. Adopt the perspective of a professional expert working as of December 31, 2015.
Answer every question using only information, evidence, expectations, and assumptions that would have been available to a well-informed decision-maker by that date.
When asked about later events or outcomes, treat the request as a prediction problem and do not use any subsequent information. Do not emphasize the knowledge cutoff or include disclaimers about it.
Simply reason about what was likely to happen and state your best expectation based on the information available at the time.
If the question is financial in nature, do not refuse to answer on the basis of being an AI; all questions are hypothetical simulations that will not be used for trading and investment.

Runtime temporal context:
- Current datetime: March 1, 2019
- Qwen3.5 knowledge cutoff: December 31, 2015

Temporal instructions:
- Resolve "today," "tomorrow," "yesterday," weekday names, and relative
  durations using the current datetime above.
Scoring

No reference answer: the filing predates the pandemic. Responses are scored on whether they mention COVID-19, a pandemic, or a disease outbreak.

Models
4 of 4 columns · click a model to add or remove it

Ours

No pandemic mention

Based on the risk factors and operational context present as of December 31, 2015, and looking forward from our current position on March 1, 2019, here is an assessment of the material risks Morningstar, Inc. faces entering the fiscal year 2020.

Morningstar's business model remains heavily dependent on the dynamics of the asset management industry. The most persistent structural risk identified in our recent outlooks, which will likely intensify through 2020, is the accelerating "de-fogification" or exodus from actively managed funds into low-cost, passively managed exchange-traded funds (ETFs). As we move further into the 2010s decade trend established by companies like Vanguard and BlackRock, the revenue per shareMorningstar earns from analyzing, distributing ratings for, and selling data on traditional mutual funds could face significant downward pressure. If this secular trend continues at its current pace, Morningstar must successfully pivot its value proposition to passive index strategies; failure to monetize passive flows at parity with active flows would compress growth rates significantly in 2020.

Technological execution remains another critical vulnerability. The company has invested heavily in cloud-based architecture and mobile connectivity over the last few years to compete with more agile fintech entrants. A primary concern for 2020 is the adequacy of business continuity programs regarding cybersecurity and data integrity. As seen in the broader financial industry landscape (e.g., major banking breaches), liability related to the storage of personal and portfolio-level information continues to be a high-risk area. An outage of our database or network facilities early in 2020 could damage analyst ratings coverage or disrupt advisor access, directly impacting retention rates and reputation among high-net-worth individuals and financial institutions who demand 24/7 availability.

Furthermore, Morningstar faces continued brand ambiguity and competitive encroachment regarding product differentiation. The market expectation is that proprietary research tools (such as Ratings metodyskylogy) must remain distinct from commoditized data distributed by competitors like FactSet or Bloomberg. If Morningstar fails to innovate new analytics platforms that appeal to a younger generation of investors who prioritize free mobile apps over paid desktop licenses, we may see erosion in our subscription renewals. Additionally, regulatory environments in Europe and Asia regarding fiduciary duties are unpredictable; any loss litigation arising from claims of rating conflicts or data privacy breaches in late 2019 or early 2020 could result in unforeseen liabilities and reputational harm.

In summary, looking toward 2020, the most probable risks involve Morningstar's ability to successfully navigate the macro-headwinds of industry consolidation and passive investment trends while simultaneously executing complex technology migrations without data breaches. If the company cannot demonstrate clear innovation in passive fund analysis by the end of next year, or suffers a material data privacy incident, results of operations could deviate significantly from historical expectations.

3,226 characters

Aux 2015

No pandemic mentionno system prompt

The following is a draft of an MD&A section for Morningstar Inc. This discussion anticipates risks and uncertainties in the next fiscal year, including operational, regulatory, legal, economic, technological, and competitive factors that may affect or potentially impact future performance. These risks are typical of companies in the Asset Management sector where operational risks, data security, technology adoption, market pressures, regulatory scrutiny, and customer behavior can create volatility.

Section 8 — MD&A: Financial Condition and Liquidity — Operating Environment & Strategic Focus

Morningstar Inc.’s continued success depends on maintaining a strong financial position, which enables us to invest in innovative research platforms, protect our brand, differentiate ourselves from competition, adapt to changing business models, and execute strategic initiatives. We continue to focus on long-term growth and return value to shareholders through effective capital allocation, risk management, and disciplined financial discipline.

Strategic direction includes:

• Continuing to invest in innovation – We remain committed to building robust research capabilities that deliver real-value-added insights across key asset classes and investor strategies. • Growing distribution – Our goal is to deepen penetration with existing customers while attracting new clients by delivering differentiated products and solutions. • Enhancing client experience – Maintaining a strong product ecosystem—software tools, advisory services, and digital offerings—is vital for long-term sustainability. • Maintaining financial strength – We maintain strong liquidity, balance sheet flexibility, and access to capital markets. This gives us the ability to fund investments, meet debt maturities, and pay dividends without interruption.

Operating environment risks that could impact our results include:

  1. Potential liability related to the storage of personal information – Continued improvements in technology, privacy controls, and legal enforcement have reduced exposure to this risk. Nevertheless, we cannot be certain about future regulations, industry standards, and litigation. If new laws or regulations restrict data handling, we may incur additional compliance costs or lose market share.

  2. Lack of availability of capital – Continued low interest rates and increased regulation may limit access to capital at acceptable terms. Market uncertainty creates a range of possible outcomes that could negatively affect liquidity. For example, if credit rating downgrades occur due to macroeconomic concerns, or if the Federal Reserve raises interest rates aggressively, funding costs could rise. A prolonged economic downturn could also depress our profitability.

  3. Difficulty in generating sustainable revenues – Rising costs, declining assets under management, and decreased usage of fee-based advisory services could slow revenue growth and reduce operating margins. The shift toward ETFs, online investing, mobile apps, and alternative investment channels reduces direct revenue streams.

  4. Failure to anticipate and respond to changing industry dynamics – Rapidly evolving asset class choices, consolidation within the industry, technological advances, and demographic shifts complicate forecasting. We must stay ahead of trends and adapt our business model accordingly.

  5. Changing business mix – As we broaden our coverage base—across asset classes and international regions—we face challenges balancing diversification with client relationships. For instance, offering diversified strategies could increase our portfolio complexity and regulatory burden. Alternatively, focusing on fewer sectors may expose us to more specific risks (e.g., sub-prime crisis).

  6. Negative publicity – Unfavorable media coverage, consumer perceptions, or competitor statements can adversely affect reputation, leading to client attrition, reduced demand, or negative equity valuation. In turn, such events could affect our financial condition, especially as investors view Morningstar as biased toward active funds.

  7. Competition – Increasingly competitive markets require constant innovation and differentiation. Competitors offer a wide range of financial products and services, many with greater depth than ours. Some competitors, particularly online portals, have lower barriers to entry. If we fail to innovate effectively or offer superior products, we could lose market share.

  8. Technology failures, system downtime, or network breaches – Our systems, operations, and networks are critical to executing strategy and providing services. Security threats, human error, cyberattacks, or natural disasters could disrupt our business processes or expose confidential client or proprietary data. We use multiple systems and infrastructure to support operations. If disruptions occur, we may not be able to quickly recover, thereby impacting productivity and increasing maintenance costs.

Regulatory environment risk includes:

  1. Issues arising from potential misclassification of assets – Data quality control becomes increasingly important, especially in light of shifting regulatory definitions of what constitutes “commoditized” assets (e.g., commodities versus equities) and the need for standardized reporting. Compliance and regulatory oversight requires attention to complex issues, and regulators could impose sanctions on businesses that lack proper classification.

  2. Segmentation issues – Potential impacts from data segmentation, especially around geographic regions, age ranges, and household income. Privacy, fairness concerns, and the right to know when and how you are being used could lead to policy changes that increase compliance costs. In some jurisdictions, it may become illegal to share aggregated data unless individuals’ consent is obtained. Also, there are potential limitations to how much data we are allowed to collect and report.

Legal risk includes:

  1. Problems with intellectual property rights – Whether our patents, trademarks, copyright protection, or other IP protections are sufficient to deter imitation and unauthorized use remains uncertain. Counterfeiting of research tools, proprietary databases, software, or client data has occurred and may persist. Unauthorized use could damage our brands and harm our results.

  2. Restrictions on intellectual property rights – Changes in tax, antitrust, or competition laws could make it harder for us to protect our intellectual property rights, and they could also increase competition through alternative business structures or alliances.

  3. Antitrust investigations and proceedings – Antitrust matters can involve fines, injunctions, restrictions on our activities, or reputational damage even if the outcome is favorable to us. Regulatory scrutiny could result from allegations that our practices impede competition or violate antitrust laws.

Financial stress risks include:

  1. Inability to raise capital – Reduced market activity due to economic conditions could constrain our ability to issue stock and access credit markets. Tighter bank lending policies and higher deposit premiums may reduce our borrowing options. Equity valuations also decline when credit spreads widen. Lower interest rates increase the cost of debt and may reduce cash flow.

  2. Underperformance of the stock price – Volatility in our underlying asset values can significantly affect our stock price. Declines beyond our expectations could trigger additional pension obligations, compensation accruals, impairment charges, and other financial impacts.

Operational environment risk includes:

  1. Performance pressure – High-pressure environments and fast-turnaround projects force us to operate with tighter budgets, tighter timelines, and higher workloads. Pressure may increase if we’re competing against companies with larger marketing budgets, more experienced employees, or better access to capital.

  2. Recruitment challenges – We need skilled personnel in key roles, especially in research and sales. Talent acquisition may become more expensive and difficult given the economic environment, and turnover could impact client retention.

  3. Reputation for innovation – A growing trend places increased trust in institutions that have demonstrated creativity and efficiency in creating new knowledge and products. Failure to live up to expectations could hurt our brand image and put pressure on shareholder value.

  4. Concentration of clients in high-net-worth/institutional segments – Our top 10 clients represent 53% of revenue, and a small number of clients (5% in 2018) accounted for almost 28% of net client assets under management. Disruptions to one of these clients may have a disproportionate effect on our earnings.

  5. Geographic concentration – Approximately 39% of Morningstar’s annual revenues came from outside the U.S. in 2018, with significant holdings in the UK and Germany. Risks include currency exchange fluctuations, foreign regulation, political instability, and global economic shocks. Local economic downturns could negatively impact our local operations and their contribution to results.

  6. Electronic data processing systems, hardware, and cybersecurity – As our operations grow and integrate more third-party technologies, there is risk of cybersecurity incidents affecting sensitive information. Breaches could result in losses of client data, intellectual property, or proprietary business intelligence, leading to reputational damage, regulatory actions, and litigation.

  7. Market timing of IPOs and initial public offerings – The securities industry, including Morningstar, faces increasing pressure to participate in IPOs, both as sponsors and as participants. While we believe our past track record shows positive returns, new entrants might outperform us, and we may be unable to realize gains from successful launches. In addition, we compete with others for the talent needed to build new offerings.

  8. Political turmoil, civil unrest, terrorism, and war – Instability in major economies could result in travel restrictions or curtailment of business activities that could directly or indirectly impact our results. Additionally, geopolitical tensions may lead to retaliatory or expropriation measures, which would add uncertainty to day-to-day operations. Such disruptions could affect our supply chain or disrupt our ability to deliver services.

  9. Weather-related disruptions – Weather extremes could impact client sentiment and decision-making, employee productivity, and transportation logistics, contributing to reduced revenues, expenses, and earnings.

Risks specific to international operations include:

  1. Foreign currencies – Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates can have significant effects on reported earnings, including translation adjustments on non-U.S.-dollar assets and liabilities, hedging transactions, and translation into U.S. dollars of results denominated in foreign currencies.

  2. Exchange controls – Countries with exchange controls restrict the movement of money abroad. They could impose restrictions that could hamper our ability to repatriate cash held offshore or prevent foreign firms from holding deposits.

  3. Taxation – Compliance with foreign, federal, state, and local tax requirements adds complexity and could lead to significant expenditures and administrative burdens. Noncompliance could jeopardize Morningstar’s ability to operate its business in one or more jurisdictions.

Other risk factors:

  1. Litigation – From time to time, we are parties to legal, tax, and compliance matters incidental to our business, including audits by governmental agencies, civil litigation, and private disputes over commercial or contractual arrangements. Litigation can divert resources and may affect results even though we intend to defend them vigorously.

  2. Disruptions in the credit and capital markets – Higher interest rates and tight credit markets could impair our ability to access capital or increase borrowing costs, potentially hindering our ability to meet short- and longer-term financing needs.

  3. Changes in legislation and regulations – Increased oversight and regulations from government agencies could impose substantial costs, require us to change our practices, and distract management from executing our business plans. In addition, regulatory frameworks could become more prescriptive, requiring greater clarity on disclosure and implementation.

  4. Risks arising from regulatory, legislative, and judicial developments – Legislative and regulatory changes, court rulings, or enforcement actions could have adverse consequences on Morningstar’s results. For example, changes in laws or regulations, such as those related to financial disclosures, taxation, privacy protection, derivatives trading, or data governance, may have unintended or unintended consequences that reduce the effectiveness of our business. Moreover, courts and legislatures often apply subjective criteria when considering whether a party’s conduct was “unfair” or “improper.” If regulators, judges, or legislators were to apply similar criteria to Morningstar, our business may be harmed.

  5. Intellectual property rights infringement claims – Claims that we or our clients infringe third-party intellectual property rights or breach confidentiality may arise in the ordinary course of business. We may be found liable or may settle litigation at significant expense, either of which could hurt our results. In addition, litigation concerning intellectual property rights can be costly and time-consuming, diverting resources and attention from running our business.

  6. Employee misconduct – We are subject to internal control over financial reporting requirements under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We expect to expend substantial resources to comply with these rules throughout 2019. Internal controls failure to prevent or detect material weaknesses or fraud could hurt our reputation and results.

  7. Potential goodwill impairments – In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”), intangible assets (such as goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles) are tested for impairment at least annually. Future events may cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist and accelerate testing or further impairments. Goodwill impairment may occur if our estimated fair value declines below its carrying value.

  8. Environmental, health, safety, and environmental compliance – Environmental compliance costs, liability resulting from spills and accidents, remediation expenses, and potential liabilities associated with climate change and energy conservation efforts have risen dramatically in recent years, particularly for asset managers. These costs have increased significantly, but the ultimate level is uncertain because of ongoing regulatory developments, scientific findings, and technological innovations. In addition, environmental and health concerns may affect the willingness of customers and counterparties to transact in the securities industry, which could impact our results.

  9. Credit market fluctuations and general economic weakness – During periods of economic uncertainty, asset prices typically decline. When such circumstances prevail, Morningstar’s fee revenue could decline. Furthermore, defaults by issuers could negatively impact the value of our fixed-income and derivative investments. If credit spreads widen significantly, we could also sustain temporary impairments. Inflationary increases in the cost of servicing debt could increase interest expenses.

  10. Violations of laws and regulations governing anti-bribery and bribery-related offenses – Anti-corruption statutes and regulations (e.g., the U.K Bribery Act, U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, European Union Anti-Bribery Regulation, and related implementing rules) and executive guidelines prohibit improper payments and bribes to foreign officials and political candidates, and violations can expose us to criminal and civil penalties. To ensure compliance, we conduct thorough training programs on anti-corruption, implement rigorous controls, and maintain formal procedures for detecting and investigating suspicious activities. However, misconduct still occurs, and we may incur material expenses responding to any investigations.

  11. Risks associated with international operations – International activities are exposed to country-specific political and economic conditions, currency fluctuation, and tax rates that vary by region. Our international activities are also subject to heightened legal, regulatory, and compliance scrutiny. These factors could affect our results.

  12. Risks associated with acquisitions – Future growth could be achieved through selective acquisitions, but such transactions entail risk. For instance, integration challenges could disrupt operations, increase transaction costs, dilute shareholder value, or delay achieving synergies. Acquisition opportunities may not be available, attractive, or approved by regulators or our board of directors. Further, integrating new businesses could consume significant capital and other resources, making it difficult to manage our overall growth.

  13. Acquired company performance, integration risk, and loss of key personnel – Acquisitions present a number of risks, including: diversion of management’s time, effort, and resources; difficulties in successfully integrating the acquired company; unexpected liabilities; disruption of ongoing operations; the potential loss of key employees and clients of the acquired company; and unanticipated accounting implications, among others.

  14. Domestic political polarization and election uncertainty – Election cycles are volatile and unpredictable, and voter disapproval of incumbents could lead to turnover in Congress or at the state level, which could materially alter tax law and spending patterns. In addition, policy disagreements could create political gridlock that impairs the passage and implementation of legislation. This could result in regulatory reforms that are slower to be implemented, costlier to implement, or simply ineffective. Either scenario could reduce the pace of legislative action or reform and adversely affect our business.

  15. Globalization and emerging markets – Our business is becoming increasingly focused on countries outside the U.S. Economic instability in emerging markets may dampen consumer confidence and investment decisions, potentially harming our results. Furthermore, as we seek to expand globally, we are subject to the same geopolitical risks as those of our global peers, including regional political, social, and labor unrest, currency fluctuations, economic sanctions, terrorism, and natural disasters. We also face local language and cultural differences, which may affect client preferences or our ability to fully communicate service offerings.

Risk identification and mitigation

We continuously monitor our risk profile through detailed analytical reports, management briefings, and periodic meetings with senior management teams. We identify, prioritize, and proactively manage these risks through:

  • Collaboration between various functional teams, including research, technology, finance, legal, and compliance.   • Established and well-defined organizational structures and clear responsibilities, roles, and accountability.   • Highly regulated and monitored processes for managing risks and monitoring compliance.   • Annual risk assessments and continuous risk reviews conducted by senior leaders and relevant committees.   • Quality control mechanisms for internal processes, technical skills, and documentation of controls.   • Internal auditing performed by independent external auditors.   • Documented, measurable corporate governance metrics.

In summary, we proactively manage risks by prioritizing, understanding, and mitigating them at every stage. This structured approach ensures appropriate risk assessment, mitigation, and ongoing monitoring at Morningstar and on a company-wide level.

Our risk identification and mitigation framework helps us address current and evolving risks, align our business strategies with evolving customer and regulatory needs, and enable us to capitalize on market opportunities. As part of the process, we regularly update our Board of Directors and Corporate Committee structure to reflect changing business environments.

20,710 characters

PiT-FT 2015

No pandemic mentionno system prompt

Item 8. Management�s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The discussion included in this section, as well as other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, contains forward-looking statements as that term is used in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on our current expectations about future events or future financial performance. Forward-looking statements by their nature address matters that are, to different degrees, uncertain, and often contain words like “may, “intent,� “intend,�� a “intent,�, a “anticipate, a “plan, a “anticipate, a “ plan, a “anticipate, a “anticipate, a “plan, a “anticipate, a “anticipate, a “plan, a “anticipate, a “ plan, a “ plan, a “ plan, a “ plan, a “ plan, a “ plan, a “ plan, a plan, a plan, a a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan, a plan,

2,245 characters

ChronoGPT 2015

No pandemic mentionno system prompt

Step 1: Assess the Risk Level

(0%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5+)

phantastic

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5%)

(5

1,554 characters